Monday, April 6, 2009

Yay! Blogs are so cool!

Yes, I know, I missed class today. You see I have an affliction, it's called the Elementary Education department. Of all my classes this semester, English 337 is the most fun, and it's only for my minor! So anyway, I had to present a lesson plan to some freshmen at Belgrade High, and the only day and time that my supervisor could be present was April 6, 2009 at 8:30 A.M. How messed up is that? Seriously, I tried to find another day, but every time that I suggested she had some other conflict with. (Yeah, like I don't?) But it's over now! I don't have to deal with her or the internship any longer! And now on to the reason blogs are so cool.

Today was a very important day to be in class. Today was the day that we would be creating the test questions. I couldn't come to class, but the blogs could bring the class to me! I still wish that I could have been in class, I like being able to take my own notes, but at least it's not like I am totally out of the loop. I have read Charismatic Kari's, Lisa's of the Little Legs, Emo Erin's, Sutter's Sacker of Cities, Chris's Scribbles the Scribe, and Two-Tongued Charlies's blogs avidly. And then looked up the recommended chapters and pages. I actually may have studied for this test more than previous tests because of my very absence! Isn't that cool?!

I also want to bring to your attention that I have changed the names on my blog list. I meticulously went through and correlated the blogger to his or her epithet. It is my hope to be able to help myself and others when trying to learn the epithets by the end of the semester with these name changes. There are a few that I did not find epithets for. These people are Brian Larscheid, Claire Collier, Lynn Doyle, and Alex Emory. Does anybody know if they are even in the class, and, if so, what their epithets are? There was only one other problem I ran into. I could not find a blog for Red Damsel Daniel. Does anybody have her blog? She's obviously still in class, as Chris the Scribe has her picture with her epithet on it.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Christine of the Laughing Rats

On Friday we had a rare treat, as Christine of the Laughing Rats actually brought her rats to school with her! She brought them out for a short period towards the end of class, sending some students into mild shock, but entrancing the rest of the class with these charming animals. As I was fortunate enough to have been carrying my camera with me on that particular day, I managed to snap some photos of the laughing rats to share with all of you!

(Edit: Sorry for the misspelling of your name Christine.)

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Changing names?

Does anybody know how to change the names in the blog list? I clicked on the icon of the crossed screwdriver and wrench and it brought up my list of blogs with options to rename or delete them, but when I click on the rename option it goes nowhere, nothing happens.

I wanted to rename everyone's blog with their epithets, except there are some of people that have the same first name, so I don't know if I can do that either; I don't know how to differentiate between them.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

My Memeory Theater

To memorize my 50 items (spices) I used a combination of my kitchen and my imagination. I decided that the most logical place to have spices was in the kitchen, but after a while I ran out of places to put all of them, so then I started to imagine objects in and around the kitchen, too.

So my list of 50 is:
  1. Rosemary
  2. Ginger
  3. Caraway Seed
  4. Licorice
  5. Cloves
  6. Mace
  7. Lemon Peel
  8. Orange Zest
  9. Allspice (yes, it is a true spice not a combination of some)
  10. Chervil
  11. Cilantro
  12. Parsley
  13. Bay Leaves
  14. Shallots
  15. Fennel Seed
  16. Cinnamon
  17. Nutmeg
  18. Mint
  19. Saffron
  20. Turmeric
  21. Tarragon
  22. Red Pepper
  23. Cayenne
  24. Thyme
  25. Arrow Root
  26. Savory
  27. Paprika
  28. Marjoram
  29. Wasabi
  30. Dill
  31. Vanilla
  32. Mustard
  33. Cream of Tartar
  34. Basil
  35. Garlic
  36. Sage
  37. Anise Seed
  38. Juniper Berries
  39. Celery Seed
  40. Sesame Seed
  41. Coriander
  42. Salt (yes, I know it's not truly a spice but rather a mineral, but we all use it to enhance flavor)
  43. Pepper
  44. Oregano
  45. Horse Radish
  46. Chives
  47. Onion
  48. Cumin
  49. Cardamon
  50. Fenugreek
I started by thinking about what the spices are used for. After I ran out of places to put them according to their use, after all there is only so much space on the stove or in the counter top oven, I started looking at places were I keep the spices. Then I went on to placing the spices by how they sounded. So it went something like this... (Spices in italics)

Rosemary with ginger hair is standing in the coriander (corridor) between the wall and the counter. She is leaving for a trip so next to her is caraway seeds because she needs to carry with her licorice to eat and mace and cloves (clubs) to keep her safe. Further along the counter, I have a fruit basket and it has lemon peel and orange zest in it. Next to that is my spice rack so it is allspice. Above the spice rack is a cupboard upon which I have placed a set of three decorations. These became chervil, cilantro, and parsley because these spices are most commonly used for garnishes. Going along the wall, I have a bay leaves (bay) window over the sink, in which I imagine a fish ready to be garnished with shallots. In the drying rack next to the sink is a fennel seed (funnel). In the corner of the kitchen I still have some Christmas decorations left out, and when I think of Christmas I think of cinnamon, nutmeg, and mint. Beyond the corner is the stove where I cook rice with saffron and turmeric, and I also have a skillet out to make mushroom omelets with tarragon. The burners on the stove are hot so they became and red pepper and cayenne. Over the stove is a microwave that shows the thyme (time) with arrowroot (arrow) buttons. Next to those is the rotisserie oven in which I cook savory chicken with paprika (the first spice I ever used on chicken). In my pantry I have wasabi which is marjoram (majorly) spicy and dill pickles. Beyond the pantry is the refrigerator which has vanilla ice cream in the freezer and mustard in the cooler. Then I moved on to the floor. I thought about the spilled cream of tartar in front of the fridge. Beyond that was Basil the mouse (from "The Great Mouse Detective") ready to lick up the cream. I looked at the tiles on the floor and thought of a garden that I might plant with anise seed and celery seed with hedgerows of juniper berries and sage. At this point I ran out of places in the kitchen, so I moved it on out to the dinning room, following Seseme (seed) Street. On the table, of course, is salt and pepper. Then the square placemat reminded me of oregano (Oregon). I had a hard time with horseradish until I placed a horse in my dinning room as well. Then I realized that spices are no good without a cook, so I added some things to my own person. On my head I had a shock of chives sprouting from my crown. I was crying from cutting up dried onion. I was cold so I was wearing a cardamom (cardigan). And in my and I held a funnel with a Greek letter on it (fennugreek). Then somebody called my name so I hollared, "Cumin (Coming)!"

Sunday, March 29, 2009

What good are books?

Yes, so I was caught reading in class on Friday. And not one of the three books for class. Oops! So, what was I doing? I was looking for the origin of the now popular designer breed dogs. How does one trace the oral language. By definition, orality is impossible to trace by the very ephemerality of its nature. So how do we find out how long the word has been in use? We use literature, of course.

In this case, an argument had erupted between a friend and me about how long people have been breeding two distinct breeds of dogs to create a cross breed. (On purpose, obviously, accidental crosses have been around forever.) Many people are familiar with the Labradoodle, almost the President's dog of choice, and long been purported to be allergen and shedding free. But the question was, when did these mixes start becoming popular? So I turned to books to help me find the answer. I still have not come across conclusive evidence as to the year the designer breed fad started, but I did find reference in The Girls of Huntington House (the book I was reading in class) to a Cockapoo, which is a crossing of a Cocker Spaniel and a Poodle (usually miniture or toy). The book was first published in 1972. This means that the word Cockapoo had to have been in common usage from at least sometime in the 1960's.

So you see, I do not need help, as Dr. Sexson claimed; rather, I was doing research into the origins of a word, which surely started by the oral tradition of labaling things, but can only be traced now by literature.

The combination of two words to create a new word is called portmanteau. For example, brunch is a combination of breakfast and lunch, a spork is one of those annoying plastic impliments you find at picnics that resemble a spoon with tines. When did portmanteau come to mean this? Why, it was first used by Lewis Caroll in his book Through the Looking-Glass, of course!

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

The Secret Is Out!

Yes, it's true. The esoteric memory exercises, not fit for the unwashed masses, that we have been practicing in class have been revieled in this month's Women's Health (sister magazine to Men's Health) in an article titled "Total Recall". The article gives four ways to help place things in the memory.

The first one, similar to the meathod in Ad Herennium (p 11, Yates), recommends that for long lists, such as grocerie lists, you should visualize each item that you want in an unusual way. Since few people go shopping for ram's testicles, the articles uses the example of "Ryan Reynolds holding the milk in one hand and a loaf of bread in the other, wearing nothing by boxer briefs made out of your favorite cereal." (I'm not sure who Ryan Reynolds is, but, from the context of the article, I can assume that he is somebody who one might find strange or interesting to look at.)

Secondaly, "Total Recall" suggests that to remember random things, such as a string of numbers in a phone number, one should try to find groupings within those numbers that can be connected with on a personal level, such as birthday or lucky number.

The third meathod mentioned is our Memory Palace (although the article calls it "Use the Room").

The fourth meathod isn't so much a memory system as it is an information processing technique. When being introduced to new people, the article states, pause at every third person and comment on something about him, clothes, name, appearance, etc., and while doing this mentally review the names of the previous two people. The object of this is to slow the flow of information, giving the memory a chance to store new information before receiving more.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Pictograph system versus the alphabet

What's the word for believing one's culture to be superior to all others?

In Ong's book, he claims that the Chinese writing system is "time-consuming and elitest" p 86. He goes on to say that undoubtably, once the Chinese have seen the light and started to speak in a mutually comprehensible language, that they will automatically switch to the much simpler and clearly superior roman alphabet.

So I wanted to take a closer look at the differences and similarities of the Chinese writing system to our own writing system. The first thing that caught my attention was that Ong claimed that it took 20 plus years to become "significantly learned" in the Chinese writing system. But isn't that what it takes us in our own system? If it takes less than than 20 years, then why are we in college, majoring in English? We should already have mastered the depth and breadth of our language at the end of high school, right? In truth, grammer can be learned well by the end of fifth grade, but the nuances, shades of meaning, and spelling can take much longer, perhaps another 15 years and more. That's not so different than Ong's claim of 20 years to learn the Chinese writing system.

The K'anghsi dictionary, Ong says, contains 40,545 different characters. And nobody actually knows all of them! Did you know that the Oxford English Dictionary 2 contains 263,917 entries? http://www.oed.com/news/updates/revisions0812.html (And that's not including the various word forms that go with them.) I'm going to out on a limb here, and suggest that Ong cannot find an English speaker that knows all of those, either. As users of an alphabet, we do have an advantage here, in that even if we cannot spell the word we want correctly, we have enough of a basis in phonetics to be able to understand the intention, for the most part, of the writer, whereas, Chinese symbols misdrawn may be incopmrehensible. But the Chinese have an advantage that I feel equals that: Their symbols are mutually comprehesible between various languages, while we run into trouble the second we try to read another language.

Lastly, but surely not least, Ong attempts to make light of his disparaging analysis by writing, "The loss of liturature will be enormous, but not so enormous as a Chinese typewriter using over 40,000 character." Ha, ha, WalteRong. Somehow, I find the loss of liturature, in any language, less than laughable. If anybody is interested, here is a picture and article of the Chinese typewriter, developed by a Dr. Lin Yutang in 1946: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/07/new-typewriter-conquers-chinese-symbols/ (I recommend just reading the news article, the blogger who posted underneath it, doesn't really have a grasp of the machine or the Chinese language, and so is confused and confusing.)
This typewriter, it must be said, is much more complex than our own, and in the time one would need to learn how to use it whatever it was that needed to be typed could have been hand written and delivered.

Oh, yes, it's called ethnocentrism.

Unrelated, exept in pure coincidence, there is a movie, unfortunately only available in Europe at this time, called The Chinese Typewriter starring Tom Selleck. It's amazing what one finds on Google! If anybody has this movie, I would like to see it. Seriously! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0319180/